London stalling: the Olympic opposition

When it was announced that London had successfullycreated by the games. Anti-Olympians say these are
won its bid to host the 2012 Olympics, the nationunlikely to be filled by existing Londoners, (amongst
rejoiced. After all, along with the World Cup, no otherwhom construction skills are in scarce supply), resulting
sporting event brings as much pride, prestige andin a need for housing for incoming workers, which
investment to a country.needs to be addressed before non-housing
But even before the capital was proclaimed winner,construction projects are started. Moreover, several
there were anti-Olympic organisations springing up onthousand jobs will be displaced from the southern Lea
the web. No2London2012.org, HackTheBid.org andValley, currently an important home for much-needed
CriticalMassLondon.org.uk all tried in vain to stop"bad-neighbour" businesses which cannot easily find
London from being successful in their Olympic bid.alternative sites. And finally, anti-Olympic campaigners
Their reasons were varied; they claimed thatsaid that the Olympic bid had been imposed from
construction work associated with Olympic sites in theabove without adequate public consultation about its
Lea Valley would destroy, or make unavailable forcost, environmental and other impacts for the city as
several years, a large number of existing qualitywhole.
football pitches which local people use intensively, andHowever, despite all this, the London bid was
that there was no guarantee that the new orsuccessful, and the games must go on. The 2012 logo
"improved" sports facilities developed for the Olympicsdidn't impress everyone, but though many of the
would be later available to local people for free or at aprotesters' complaints may have been valid, few can
reasonable cost.deny that hosting the Olympic Games will bring many
They also pointed out that the games will result in aadvantages to London and the rest of the UK. The
cost to London council tax payers of £875 million;cash injection should certainly improve what are
money which Londoners need for more pressingdeemed socially and economically deprived areas; and
priorities like schools, transport, housing, health andwith thousands of spectators converging on the
other public services. Green arguments were also putcapital, shops, restaurants and hotels in London, will
forth; they claimed that the Olympic sites wouldenjoy a massive boost in business.
destroy several valued wildlife areas such as BowLike it or not, the Olympics are coming to London, so
Back Rivers and Bulley Point, which the public haveyou might as well take advantage of the world's
supported by conservation work over many years.biggest sporting event in your back yard - after all, it's
Campaigners were also unimpressed by the predictedbeen over half a century since it's come to British soil,
7000 new jobs that the government said would beand it could be another 50 years until it comes back.