The Religious Debate Of The Name Of The Rose

<!-- @page { size: 21cm 29.7cm; margin: 2cm } P {suggest that learning should be made freely accessible
margin-bottom: 0.21cm } -->to the masses. Any attempt to reserve it for a select
Is learning for all? Umberto Eco's novel- The Name offew is a self consuming endeavor.
the Rose, throws off various religious and theologicalWe find examples of this debate not just in Christianity
questions to the reader. Of the many such debates,but in Hinduism too. The Brahmins ( higher caste
one major question raised by the book is- shouldreligious scholars) sought to preserve the knowledge
learning be freely accessible by the masses or shouldof the scriptures for their self consumption only. They
it be reserved for the scholars only?maintained these scriptures in Sanskrit, a language that
The mysterious library of the prestigious medievalthe masses did not understand.
abbey is a physical symbol of this religious debate. TheBut with time, this attempt to restrict learning resulted in
Abbot requests William to investigate the murder ofa general disinterest among the masses to understand
six monks in the abbey but restrains him fromthe scriptures. The religion was reduced to a body of
investigating the library, even though many clues leadmere symbolisms and idolatry with the main message
directly to the library.of the scriptures being lost in time.
The library has been built in a way that is inaccessibleSimilarly, in today's world, the power of the Roman
to most monks. Wandering inside the library premisesChurch to preserve controversial religious documents
is also discouraged through various deviousunder its own wing has been greatly reduced. The
architectural means. The library is supposed toworld seems to be moving in a democratic direction in
preserve various scholarly treasures from across thegeneral with theological questions being open to
world but access to these books is forbidden. Monksanyone who cares to answer them.
are required to perform only transcription jobs and notA downside to this trend is that the layman may be
delve into religious debates.confused with no clear source of didactic religious
As a result of this high level of secrecy the Abbeyinstructions. Controversies on religious questions may
meets its doom at the end of the novel. The Abbotleave him bewildered- he may choose an erroneous
dies in an attempt to preserve the secrecy of thepath for himself.
murderer. The library is consumed by a devastatingHowever, the general consensus today seems to be
fire due to its architectural inaccessibility.that 'to err and learn' is more desirable than to follow
So by the ending of his novel, Umberto Eco seems toinstructions blindly.